-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moneymoney 2.4.48 url #197938
moneymoney 2.4.48 url #197938
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous link is also working but the homepage uses the package url and so I think it is worth to change it.
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |||
version "2.4.48" | |||
sha256 :no_check | |||
|
|||
url "https://service.moneymoney-app.com/1/MoneyMoney.zip" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous url
is the one provided by the vendor's sparkle feed, which is used by livecheck
. I think it is ok to leave the existing method, as it aligns more closer with the updates, unless there is a specific reason that the pkg
works better as an installer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The livecheck doesn't seem to be working as running 'brew livecheck moneymoney' brings up usage instructions for livecheck. I hadn't checked this before submitting the PR. Could I try to work on that as well and submit another PR later (and maybe close this one)? I'll keep the old url if I can figure out the livecheck block with it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The livecheck
is working fine on my end. Note that it is a developer command, so it won't work unless you have Homebrew setup as a developer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does seem to work with other casks, but it's probably something wrong on my end. Thank you for checking it out though. I don't think there's any reason why the pkg works better than the zip then, so I'm guessing this PR wasn't really needed. Apologies for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need to apologise!
Thank you for contributing
Important: Do not tick a checkbox if you haven’t performed its action. Honesty is indispensable for a smooth review process.
In the following questions
<cask>
is the token of the cask you're submitting.After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:
brew audit --cask --online <cask>
is error-free.brew style --fix <cask>
reports no offenses.Additionally, if adding a new cask:
brew audit --cask --new <cask>
worked successfully.HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --cask <cask>
worked successfully.brew uninstall --cask <cask>
worked successfully.Related to: #172732 (comment)